Questionnaire proposal from Copenhagen. A first step for exchanging information across Europa on precarization processes
De precarity webring
On the recent gathering in Hamburg, it was proposed to set some wheels in motion in regard to an exchange of information and research. The proposal from the Copenhagen Euromayday group was that a first step in this process could be based on what we already know, rather than what we are still about to learn. As such, the idea is not a very ambitious one: We are not in search for an 'objectively true description' of each and every country, based on scientifically rigorous research. Rather, what we would be interested in is an ad hoc, 'impressionist' description by the different groups, based on the underlying question: What is the present day realities in which we operate — what do we see as problems and obstacles, and what do we see as our opportunities?
Our hope is not only that questions such as these, when answered in a short and concise way, can give the groups in other countries an impression of our differences and similarities. As a bonus, we also hope this little project can work as a tool of consciousness-raising at the local level of each and every group. Having to describe one's situation 'from without,' can hopefully make one aware of things that are easily forgotten.
We would be glad to do the job of editing and publishing the reports once they have been written. Our modest hope is that the result of this process can create and facilitate new links between the local projects, also on potentially isolated issues, where it makes more sense with a bilateral relationship than a European-wide one. For example, it could be that the situation in Slovenia and Denmark converges on a specific issue, or that a project planned by an Italian group is already under way in Spain, making cooperation natural.
As to the technicalities, we would propose that no contribution exceeds a limit of 2000 words. This means that each of the four questions below would have to be answered with approximately 500 words each. The reason for this proposol is two-fold: Firstly, for the benefit of readability. Our hope is that the material actually will be read and used. Second, as already mentioned, a maximum limit will hopefully sharpen the mind and the pen when one writes!
The four questions we would like to be answered, or rather, the areas that we would like you to shed some ligt upon, is the following:
Tabla de contenidos |
1. The field of action.
Here, we would be interested in a general outlaying of the local situation in its totality (in 500 words, please!). That is, a 'refined' summary of the balance of forces in your country. One could think of it as writing a subverted article for The Economist; i.e., through the eyes not of the financier interested in investment possibilities, but the workers employed by his or her capital. What is the relationship between the working class, old and new, and the ruling class? How corporative is the union structure? Are there any examples of industrial unrest, be that in 'the old economy,' among the immaterial labourers, or among the ones currently under reproduction, as for example the students? More importantly, are there any signs of durable links between these struggles?
2. Dealing with precarity.
A general description of the most pressing questions of precarity as your group sees it: Is it linked to your own experiences, and in what way does it relate to the local and/or international socio-political situation? What will you focus on in the year to come, and why? Do you see your task mainly as one of research? of propaganda? of culture? of creating a more organisational based resistance?
3. Migration, state policies and work.
Many Euromayday groups seems to focus much of their attention on questions regarding immigration policies in general and paperless workers (waged or unwaged) in specific. But paradoxically, few if any non-Europeans have been present at the international Euromayday meetings. Is this because the question is mainly an 'external' one to the groups? More generally, we would like to know what the situation is like in regards to questions of migration in your country and/or region? Are there examples of self organisation worth mentioning? In what ways do you seek to contribute to a Europe without borders — and what does this mean, as you see it?
4. Looking ahead: Possibilities for resistance.
What are the obstacles, and what are the new potentials, for the work your group wants to engage in? Are there particular repressive strategies pursued by the government that stands in your way, and in case, how do you deal with this?
As we aim at the 1st of January 2006 as the deadline for contributions, we would like to get the process started as soon as possible. Please give us a hint in case your group will try to answer these questions, and at what date you think we could expect an answer. All the best, Euromayday Copenhagen
